Lies Lies + More Lies
'FWIW, I didn't post the M-class pictures, >>>nor did I even mention M-class in my
first two messages<<<...I did post the pictures off the site for a reason. '
Another rationalised lie. In second message you write-
'Here's the entire albums list:
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=137587'
You click on link-you go to many,many fotos of M-class-including M-class undercarriage fotos to compare to MDX undercarriage fotos. Hey give us password for your birthday fotos so we can see if you have friends or if they are just MB salesmen.
By typing link to us for 100s of M-class fotos-you mention M-class-not literally but how could one ignore? Yet you claim you do not even mention M-class in first two messages-you must be related to Bill Clinton-another rationalising lier.
If you do not want to mention M-class you do not post link to your M-class worship foto albums-but you do.
'You're wrong about MB's new SUV being unibody. There are actually two new MB SUVs coming out. One will
be unibody (this will debut first), and the second will be body-on-frame.'
Not wrong-you are wrong. I said
'MB is antiquated truck frame
design- MDX is modern unit body. MB knows this so next SV is unit body'
You yourself say the M-class replacement-will debut first-is unit body. I say >>>next<<< MB SUV is unit body. But you claim I am >>>wrong about MB's new SUV being unibody<<? You are trying to distort the facts-that even you confirm!!!!!! Yet you lie and say I am wrong. And--
'It is true that the next generation W164 M-class will be
unibody, but not because unibody in general is bad. '
'FYI, the body-on-frame MB SUV that I
mentioned is the replacement for the MB Gelandewagen. '
Correct-you twist my words. Next M-class will be unit body. M-class competes with MDX, and you post fotos comparing MDX and M-class. MB is very smart. To make best next M-class possible-needs unit body. Not current old frame-MB knows this.
SUV with frame >>MB Gelandewagon replacement<<-NOT replacement for M-class. Gelandewagon is whole different specialty vehicle that needs frame. Regular luxury SUV does not need antiquated frame-needs unit body.
'This "old design" bested the
supposedly superior unibody design (RX300) in the IIHS's 40mph crash test and remains a best pick.'
Ahah you distort then hide more facts-another form of lie like Bill Clinton does. MB tied RX300. Both GOOD overall score + 5 of 6 GOOD + 1 AVERAGE score. >>Both best picks<< but you conveniently do not mention. And witness that RX300 may be better because MB AVERAGE score is for HEAD/NECK injury-while RX300 AVERAGE score is for Structure/Safety Cage-does not sound good-but no realworld injury! Must mean that antiquated MB frame protects undercarriage better than it protects your neck! Think about it-MB vehicle with antiquated heavy frame weighs 500 more pounds than lighter, modern, unit body RX300 but RX300 ties it or does even better depending on how you read the test!
You also hide fact that BMW X5-only 200 pounds heavier not 500 like MB + RX-beat MB with PERFECT GOOD scores. BMW X5 has unit body.
I believe MB will be very disappointed about how you lie about their vehicles. Like how Volvo lied about its vehicles with the fake TV commercials.