![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Va
Posts: 18
|
04-06 Exhaust Mod (hypothetically)...
Here's some hypothetical exhaust mod plans...
(Disclaimer: These hypothetical modifications are for hypothetical OFF ROAD USE ONLY. Federal Regulations prohibit actually disabling emmissions control equipent of street-driven vehicles. Cheers!) I've edited the pic posted by AutisMDXTypeS to show my hypothetical modification plans. I'll hypothetically monitor mpg's between stages. Stage 1: Hypothetically gut the 3rd cat. I think it's only there to get the "Ultra" part of ULEV. Without it, it hypothetically meets the regular emmissions requirement. It then oughtta flow a little better, hypothetically. MPG test hypothetically in progress. Stage 2: Hypothetically remove the factory 3rd cat and feed a replacement splitting-muffler directly, Magnaflow 1in-2out (3"in-2.5"out). This will give better flow compared to the kludge of a splitter after the factory muffler. The splitting muffler's outs will transition to 2" flexible stainless tubing and stepped down to the 1-5/8"OD pipes leading to the factory mufflers. Stage 3: Replace rear mufflers with magnaflow 2" units. More flow, more noise, might be too loud for the wife? (I know my f350 with just those two mufflers is good-n-loud in WOT). Stage 4: Install 3" magnaflow cat at location of factory 3rd cat, install two O2 sensor fittings after it and move the two after-manifold-cat sensors to that location. Then hypothetically gut the manifold-cats. Emmissions are hypothetically fine as long as there's an adequate cat in the 3rd location. A correctly-selected magnaflow cat would do the job. Or, skip 3 and just hypothetically do 4, get a quieter ride and maximum power/efficiency for that quiet-tude. ![]() Here's the original pic...
__________________
91 Miata; 94 F350; 98 CRV; 04 MDX Pax Christi to ya! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,534
|
Too many hypotheticals in this...
__________________
08 X Sport/Ent -- Sterling Gray/Ebony 03 X Touring/RES -- Taffeta White/Saddle 02 Honda S2000 -- Berlina Black/Black 99 Acura RL -- Naples Gold Metallic/Parchment 12 Toyota Avalon Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Posts: 189
|
My suggestion, just replace the 3rd cat with a straight piece of pipe. In case you dont like the sound, you can always have the shop reinstall the cat. Go from there. It will still pass emissions since it is not monitored.
Personally i wouldn't mess with the primary cats and their sensors. Seriously, we know these wont be for off road use only. Nobody is here to judge or go after you. Post clips of the sound if you make any changes.
__________________
'04 A4 1.8T '04 MDX NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Va
Posts: 18
|
If I want the 3rd cat there, I'd use a 3" magnaflow because the factory cat housing has an output hole that's actually narrower than the input. While I'm sure the Honda engineers knew what they were doing when they chose such a narrow size tubing between the J-pipe and the mufflers, I think their goal was different than mine... they designed for minimal noise and emissions (ie ULEV) while trying not to sacrifice much power (but there's some power choke as a result, I think), but my goal is to accept a little more noise and emissions (yet still meet the basic emissions requirement) and free up some of those horses.
Here's a nifty chart of exhaust tubing and power capabilities... The cat narrows down to 2-1/4" and the pipe between it and the first muffler is narrower. That piping is rated to handle about 150HP. The MDX is supposed to put out 265HP. How To Calculate Muffler Size and Exhaust Pipe Diameter | Exhaust Videos
__________________
91 Miata; 94 F350; 98 CRV; 04 MDX Pax Christi to ya! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Va
Posts: 18
|
I'm using 3" pipe just because the muffler I've got is 3"in/2x2.5"out. This is a Magnaflow copy from Speedmotoring on ebay, half the price of Magnaflow but just as good. Speedmotoring's 1in2out only comes in this size. I used a couple of their 2.5" mufflers on my truck and they are nice build and sound.
__________________
91 Miata; 94 F350; 98 CRV; 04 MDX Pax Christi to ya! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Va
Posts: 18
|
Well, with Stage 1 done (gut the 3rd cat), I got no obvious benefit to mpg's. It looks like the greater constriction to exhaust flow is the pipe, 1-7/8" OD, between that cat and the mid muffler.
I just completed Stage 2 (replace cat, mid pipe and mid-muffler). It sounds much better. Before, I could start the motor, and if I didn't look at the tach, I might think it didn't start and I'd crank it again, grinding the starter. Now, it's got a nice mild rumble at idle, and overall is just barely louder than stock. I'm in the process of checking mpg impact.
__________________
91 Miata; 94 F350; 98 CRV; 04 MDX Pax Christi to ya! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 13
|
I would leave it at that. Once you take out the mufflers in the back, you will get a good amount of noise. Much more incremental than stock to mid-muffler/cat delete. Plus, there may be drone, as well.
If you want more noise, you can look into deleting the resonator that's part of your intake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Va
Posts: 18
|
MPG update: Stage 2 has netted ~2mpg improvement. My baseline is the family trip to the inlaws, about 240 miles round trip. First trip mpg net was ~20. This past Thanksgiving visit I got 22.
My next modification will be converting to true dual setup, retaining factory mufflers and primary cats. I'll hack up the J-pipe and run a pair of 2" pipes all the way back to the mufflers, with a crossover pipe just before the rear differential. I think this will get a good improvement in cruising torque (and hence mpg) due to the scavenging boost. I decided this because I noticed that the aftermarket performance J-pipes available have longer paths before merging to the collector and I figure fully dual pipes might be even better.
__________________
91 Miata; 94 F350; 98 CRV; 04 MDX Pax Christi to ya! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 182
|
Interesting work! Will you please post some pics or videos of your setup and new setup? Maybe it will be less confusing than reading all the specs for each section of the exhaust! Thanks!!! Good luck with your project!
Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com Free App
__________________
![]() http://www.cardomain.com/ride/395049...ort-utility-4d MDX Touring 2001 75W Hid Kit 6000K 15W Reverse Hid Kit 6000K Full Interior LED's |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 47
|
anyone else do this? I would like to hear a before and after sound difference of the "Stage 2". If I cut out the cat and mid muffler and put in a straight 2.5" pipe. I wonder the difference? I dont want anything excessively loud..
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|