MDX vs. Highlander - Acura MDX Forum : Acura MDX SUV Forums
Register Home Forums Active Topics Auto Loans Photo Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowInsurance
MDXers.org is the premier Acura MDX Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-06-2001, 04:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1
MDX vs. Highlander

My dad is buying an SUV soon. He has narrowed his choices to MDX and Highlander. He leaning more towards the Highlander. But I want him to get the MDX. I would like some things that would convice my dad to get the MDX over the Highlander.
ENDLESS is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-06-2001, 11:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 86
I was in almost the same situation, but not for a long time ;-)

I quickly realized that as long as I put into the HL all the options I want(fog lights, roof rack, sun-roof etc.), the price becomes quiet the same. Even when I negotiated almost $3K it was still pretty close to Premium without Navi at sticker. At least in my case I couldn't get $5K difference that I wanted to get at least. Then when I got a final price I compared what I'm gonna get and at that point it was clear to me that only one good reason to get a HL was - much faster delivery. Okay, second one was - it's built at the same factory in Japan where RX is built so quality has to be very good.

In term of features - no comparison for such a small difference in $$:
1. less powerful engine(I even did not consider 4 cyl - 2WD version, since to me this is a BS);
2. no 2 zone A/C
3. no 3rd row seats.
4. less cargo space.
5. less comfortable seats
6. no Navi(was) available.
7. better warranty for MDX + TLC

It doesn't mean everybody has to agree with me, but to me it was enough.
__________________
Granite Green 2002 Premium w/Navigation driven home on 11/20
dfroim is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2001, 11:40 AM   #3 (permalink)
Super Senior Member

 
A2MDXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,053
I was in a similar situation and would agree with most of the points made by dfroim. Also, it was tough to get an HL with the options I wanted (VSC, Priv. glass, sunroof) without getting the limited package (which I didn't want). While there was a substantial price diff. (about $3-4K) I felt the HL was somewhat "vanilla" and not fun to drive. I know the MDX is no sports car but I just felt the the options and the driving experience justified the extra cost.
__________________

2006 Pilot EXL
2001 GG MDX
A2MDXer is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2001, 04:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 13
I drove both the Highlander and the MDX several times before deciding on the MDX. If you are looking at similarly equipped vehicles, there isn't all that much difference in price. The MDX seats are far more comfortable than the Highlander. There's more leg room for the driver in the MDX. The MDX has a more powerful engine and feels more stable when driving. The Highlander feels like a minivan on the road, inadequate power, mushy steering. Talk him into the MDX.
__________________
2001 Black/Saddle Touring delivered 11/13/01
TallahasseeMDX is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2001, 06:36 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
proskunetes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 156
Some selling points for your dad:
1. Tell you dad that "women" dig the X more than the Highlander...
2. The prestige of owning a vehicle that takes premium gas...
3. You'll wash it for him every week...
4. If that doesn't work, offer to pay the difference in price...


But seriously, my neighbor works for Toyota and just purchased a Highlander for his mother and we've been talking which has led me to read several reviews. I must say that highlander is a not a shabby vehicle;in fact, it is a leader in it's class/level... but then again, it does not fall into the luxury suv category which the MDX does.

By the way, what's the reason for him getting the SUV? Practical purposes such as cargo? The third row seats that easily transforms to cargo space was a big feature for most people...
__________________
2001 MDX - Granite Grey (not Green) Base (w/Manik Polished Steel Sidesteps)
2001 ML320 - Silver (w/Manik Black Sidesteps)
proskunetes is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2001, 08:36 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mocking-DX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 281
i have the mdx and my wife has a highlander. We love the MDX. We use it more than the HL. Reason?: Navigation and luxory. Her HL is the limited(all goodies included) And mine touring/Nav. Our price difference is 7 grand. To be honest, I envy some of HL features like VSC And traction control, DRL, better radio,front seat that can fold all the way back and you can seat in the 2nd row and have an instant lazyboy chair!,full size spare,les wind noise, intermittent rear wiper, power lumbar,. BUT THEn I have the navi, luxory image, 3rd row seat, bigger overall, handles better. SO my choice is still the MDX. Your dad will break-in that MDX faster than Jeff Gordon driving in Indiana 500.
__________________
2k1 GG MDX, T & N, PS2, back up camera

2K1 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER, KENWOOD NAVI, PS2, SANTECA BACK UP CAMERA
Mocking-DX is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2001, 12:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 94
Not that the Highlander is unsafe, but the MDX has been rated as being the safer of the two in offset crash testing.

http://www.highwaysafety.org/vehicle...ary_midsuv.htm
rspitz is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-07-2001, 07:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 339
Low end Highlander is a nice choice

I agree with you all's views. Highlander was my initial choice but when I got into options and luxary, it is at the price of MDX without being an MDX.

I think Highlander is a wonderful car too but is more justified to buy when you buy it at a "lower end". If you get options and packages, you then will be missing the boat for not having an MDX.

Just my two cents..
__________________
Ordered 8/27/01. Picked up 11-22-01. '02 Red Rock Tour-Nav. Wood Steering-Meter- Knob, TH, MG, WL. , First Red Rock in Memphis.
RedMdxMemphis is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Acura MDX Forum : Acura MDX SUV Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Random Question

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright 2000-2010 MDXers.org. All Rights Reserved.