![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
|
Rear brake replacement - DIY
I didn't see any recent posts on this and I just completed the job so I thought I would give the members my own experience. I have an '08 Tech with 63,000 miles. Brakes were all the factory installed. Rear pads were at 2mm.
Follow this post at your own risk: I bought Centric rotors and ceramic pads from Tire Rack. Shipped they were $150. Lifted the rear of the vehicle and placed on jack stands. Removed wheels. Removed the two rotor retaining screws after striking them with a hammer and applying penetrating oil. Removed two guide pin bolts holding the caliper and pads using 14mm (?) socket Removed the caliper and pads from the caliper carrier Removed the two larger bolts (17mm socket) holding the caliper carrier in place I found it useful to apply penetrating oil on all of the above. They came right off. Removed the caliper carrier. Removed the rotor. Sprayed everything with brake cleaner and scrubbed all metal with wire brush. Replaced pads in caliper using the new shims and wear indicator provided by Centric. Adjusted the e-brake shoe using the wheel located at the 6 o'clock position on the wheel hub. Must spin in a counter-clockwise direction to tighten the e-brake. Placed new rotor on the wheel hub Replaced rotor retaining screws. Lined up the large hole in rotor hub with the e-brake adjustment wheel. Spun adjustment wheel until I could not move the rotor anymore, then backed it off a bit spinning the adjustment the other direction until the rotor moved freely again Removed the rubber plug from the old rotor hub and placed it in the hole in new rotor Replace caliper carrier. Tighten bolts. Replace caliper and new pads. Tighten bolts. Replace road wheel. Repeat the same for other side. Torque all lug nuts and road test. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 5,548
|
Nice!
__________________
08 X Sport/Ent -- Sterling Gray/Ebony 03 X Touring/RES -- Taffeta White/Saddle 02 Honda S2000 -- Berlina Black/Black 99 Acura RL -- Naples Gold Metallic/Parchment 12 Toyota Avalon Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 30
|
Do you need a special tool to compress / twist the caliper back in on the rears? I know on the fronts you can just push it back in place.
__________________
2006 Sagebrush Pearl/Navi 2005 TSX/Navi |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
|
No "special" tools needed. The only tools I used for the job were socket wrenches, a pad spreader to push the piston back into the caliper (you can also use large groove joint pliers) and a screw driver to turn the e-brake adjustment nut. I also put a little anti-seize compound on the fasteners when replacing them and some anti-squeak paste on the caliper contact points to the back of the pads for good measure. Not required, just an old habit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 17
|
Bimmer, thanks for taking the time to write this up! One issue I would strongly disagree with is the using of anti-seize on any of the brake fasteners; I would actually recommend theadlocker. There is a belief that threadlocker will prevent corrosion between the bolt and carrier such that is is more easily removed at a later date which I suspect is your concern for using anti-seize.ffice
ffice" />I seem to recall that BMW called for threadlocker on the caliper carrier bolts (can't recall on the caliper pins) as did my old Merkur back in the day (perhaps a German thing?). Not sure about Honda/Acura, but I think it is a good practice. Naked bolts would be better than anti-seize in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 17
|
Sorry, seems some formatting gibberish got trapped in my message above:
Bimmer, thanks for taking the time to write this up! One issue I would strongly disagree with is the using of anti-seize on any of the brake fasteners; I would actually recommend theadlocker. There is a belief that threadlocker will prevent corrosion between the bolt and carrier such that is is more easily removed at a later date which I suspect is your concern for using anti-seize. I seem to recall that BMW called for threadlocker on the caliper carrier bolts (can't recall on the caliper pins) as did my old Merkur back in the day (perhaps a German thing?). Not sure about Honda/Acura, but I think it is a good practice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Winchester, ma
Posts: 454
|
With a name like Bimmerdrvr I assume your other car is a BMW. What are you driving?
I also have an x3 and frequent the Bimmerfest board. I've done the brakes for both and they are both really easy except for the rotor retaining screws on the MDX
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
I found the Acura brake parts easier to work with than my ///M. The retaining screws on the MDX rotors came off easily with a few blows of a hammer, penetrating oil and using an impact driver with a snuggly fit Phillips head. That said, I was paranoid about stripping it based on a terrible experience I had on my M which involved drilling out the retaining hex bolt. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|