![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Photo Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 683
|
inside of the cover and gasket..
yeah did clean the exhaust residue (black crust) on the grooves in the cover, the gasket, in the "U" shaped inlet on the right and the holes on top of each intake tunnel.
__________________
'01 MDX '99 Accord |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clovis, CA
Posts: 10,732
|
What mdxforever is doing came up some time ago as a good 'mid-life' maintenance thing to do if you are handy. A couple of people who did it claimed the eingine seemed more responsive and/or smoother afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
shouldn't the gasket be preventing this from happening though ? I guess I am just trying to find out if this much amount of oil is normal or something to do about.
__________________
'01 MDX '99 Accord |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 683
|
Its beyond me why auto manufacturers don't implement an oil catch can, even in its most simplest form. Something like this -
http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/show...1&page=1&pp=25 (see the last post also on that page)
__________________
'01 MDX '99 Accord |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 46
|
I apologize for resurrecting and old thread, but I do have a question...
Can you clean and reuse the same intake cover gasket? The only reason I ask, is because they're around $40 to replace. If you can clean and reuse, what type of cleaner can be used safely, and what type of gasket sealer do would you apply, if any? Thanks! -Ryan |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 46
|
Well, I was inspired by mdxforever's post, and since I was tired of getting 17-18mpg averages (dropped suddenly from 21-22mpg), I decided to go ahead and clean my intake as well. Mine actually looked worse than his! Several of the grooves were completely blocked, and all of the intake holes were 50-90% blocked with carbon and sludge residue.
- Reminds me of what plaque buildup in arteries must look like... I basically sprayed some throttle body cleaner on each part, and let it soak. What was remaining, I scraped off with a screwdriver, and sucked up as much as I could with a shop vac. I used paper towels to soak up the pools of oil on top of the intake ports. I also took the time to check the EGR valve (which seemed fine, as the plunger worked freely, and there was not much carbon buildup at all), as well as replace the PCV valve. The old had quite a bit of oily junk on the plunger, and just looked tired. I figured, for a $4 part, I might as well just change it out. The replacement had a bit different angle on the end (a 90 degree bend, vs. the 45 degree bend that the stock one had), but it didn't seem to make a difference, other than the fact that the hose had to bend a bit more to connect. During this entire process, I disconnected the negative battery terminal to reset the ECM. Someone here mentioned that once the battery was reconnected, that you should allow the computer to set the idle speed by letting the car idle without load (no AC) until the radiator fans kick on twice. I did this, and then took it for a drive. My MPG average for the same daily drive route climbed back up to 21mpg! Not only that, but the car runs SO much stronger now. No more surging during heavy acceleration, and it seems to have it's "oomph" back. I guess I should not be surprised, considering what the intake looked like... it was like the engine was trying to breath through pinholes... I think that the mpg may even get better, considering the ECM may need some time to learn my driving habits all over again. The MDX currently has 96K on it, and it seems stronger than when we bought it at 45K... Not bad! Thanks for the great thread! -Ryan |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 10,566
|
Wow, good stuff!
__________________
***2001-2006 MDX FAQ*** 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX Wagon 2004 MDX Touring - Midnight Blue Pearl |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, MO
Posts: 46
|
I guess I should really clarify that I didn't clean the intake valves directly, but rather the intake cover, the area concealed below the cover, and the gasket (see mdxforever's pics). I believe this area is mainly for the PCV/EGR system?
When you take off the intake cover, you will see the cast valve ports (with those little holes on top of each one). I did not go any farther than this. I'm sure that if I unbolted further, and actually gained access to the intake valve ports, there would have been more to clean, but considering those ports are much larger, I didn't think the carbon buildup would have affected their function. It was more the little holes on top of each valve port that I was concerned with, as they were VERY clogged up. I basically just scraped and liquified the buildup with the throttle body cleaner, keeping the best of care to keep as much from falling down into the valves as possible, as I didn't want to make things any worse. The one thing I wish I did, was replace the valve cover gasket (it's metal). I learned that it's a good idea to replace it if you unbolt the cover (I guess it compresses a bit?), although once mine was cleaned, it literally looked new. I didn't put any kind of sealer on it, as it didn't appear to have any to begin with. I also later learned, that the service manual calls for the cover bolts to be removed/replaced in a certain pattern - a procedure which I assume serves the same purpose as when you tighten the lug nuts on your wheels... Since I didn't do this either, I can only hope that it tightened adequately. To gain access to the intake cover, all you need to do is remove the bolts from the plastic shroud (the one that says 3.5L VTEC ULEV on it) and take it off. You'll see the cast, dull metallic intake directly underneath. There are at least 10+ bolts to remove the intake cover. Try to remove them in a star pattern to avoid uneven pressure on the cover. As for the PCV valve replacement, it is dead easy to do, but a bit awkward to reach. I'll have to take a picture to better describe where it's located (it's kinda centrally mounted, below the intake - has a rubber hose connected to it with a clamp) - but it simply pulls out of it's rubber boot. Slide the hose clamp down a bit to release pressure, and replace it with the new. It's just a simple plastic valve. The factory version has a 45 degree break in it - but the OEM replacement that I found had a 90 degree break. Apparently it doesn't affect the function. If you shake it, you can hear the plunger rattle around a bit (if it's not completely gummed up. It's hard to believe that such a cheap little part is responsible for such mileage/performance robbing ability... Good luck! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|